000			05102cam a2200529Ia 4500
001			ocn818846304
003			OCoLC
005			20240829105907.0
006			m d
007			cr cnu---unuuu
008			121124s2012 pau o 000 0 eng d
040			_aEBLCP _beng _cEBLCP _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dN$T
020			_a9789027273161 (electronic bk.)
020			_a9027273162 (electronic bk.)
035			_a(OCoLC)818846304
035			_a502116 _b(N$T)
050		4	_aP95.455 .R47 2012
072		7	_aBUS _x047000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aFAM _x027000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a302.3 _a401.41 _222
049			_aN$TA
100	1		_aCooren, François. _9361367
245	1	0	_a(Re)presentations and Dialogue _h[electronic resource]
260			_aAmsterdam/Philadelphia : _bJohn Benjamins Pub. Co., _c2012.
300			_a1 online resource (364 p.)
490	1		_aDialogue Studies
505	0		_a(Re)presentations and Dialogue; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of contents; Introduction; References; Dialogue; 1. The issue; 2. Searching for our object 'dialogue'; 3. Identifying our scientific interest; 4. The order of object and representation; 5. How to derive methodology from the object: Basic guidelines; 6. Sample analyses; 7. The authentic text: Object or representation?; 8. Change in theorizing; References; Towards an inclusive notion of dialog for ethical and moral purposes; 1. Introduction; 2. Standpoints of this paper.
505	8		_a3. Distinction and unity between the ethical and the moral4. Common points and differences between two specific traditions of dialog's application; 5. Argumentation and negotiation; 6. Strategy to avoid dogmatism and relativism; 7. More details on the steps to treat a question according to Legault; 8. Dialog as participation: About the Bohm-Isaacs school; 9. Competence and dialog; 10. Concluding remarks: These processes considered as representation; References; Dogmatic dialogue; 1. Introduction; 2. The judicial problem.
505	8		_a3. Background on the dispute, Appellate court practice, and the case: The dispute about same-sex marriage3.1 Appellate court practice; 3.2 Washington supreme court and Andersen v. King county; 4. Method and materials; 5. Dialogic strategies in the law: Representing disagreeing others; 6. Context-spanning strategies; 7. Appellate law grounded practices; 8. Discussion and final thoughts; References; Representing gender in parliamentary dialogue; 1. Introduction; 2. Gender roles in institutional dialogue; 3. Gendering interpersonal discourse strategies in parliament.
505	8		_a4. Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address5. Parliamentary practices and master suppression techniques; 6. Master suppression techniques in parliamentary dialogue; 7. Gendering parliamentary addressing strategies in the UK Parliament; 8. Gendering parliamentary addressing strategies in the Swedish Riksdag; 9. Concluding remarks; References; Dialogue as a truth-conveying discursive strategy; 1. Introductory remarks; 2. Dialogue as a "discursive strategy"; 3. Dia-logical constraints on "informational content"; 4. The ethical dimension of dialogue.
505	8		_a5. Dialogue as a truth-conveying discursive strategy6. Concluding remarks; References; Democracy and web-based dialogue; 1. Introduction; 2. Deliberative democracy and the public sphere; 3. The public sphere: Civil society minus the state and perhaps also the economy?; 4. The role of the media; 5. The blogosphere: A virtual public sphere?; 6. Some concluding thoughts; References; The metadiscourse of "Voice"; 1. Introduction; 2. Preliminary Observations on the Pragmatics of "Voice"; 2.1 Normative valence; 2.2 Participation framework; 2.3 Communicative problems; 2.4 Legitimacy; 2.5 Strength.
500			_a2.6 Identity.
520			_aThis study pertains to the field of studies on Textual Genetics and Enunciation Linguistics and is aimed at analyzing the forms of representation of verbal erasures occurring during the writing process of a story made up by two Brazilian pupils (7 years old). Having assumed "haphazardness" and "dialogism" as the central phenomena of this process, I relate verbal erasure to the points of tension that emerge during the dialogal text established by the pupils as they discuss and write the story. The haphazardness and dialogism typical of the enunciative action are related to the writers' returns.
588			_aDescription based on print version record.
650		0	_aDialogue analysis. _931404
650		4	_aDialogue analysis. _931404
650		7	_aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Negotiating _2bisacsh _9988965
650		7	_aFAMILY & RELATIONSHIPS / Interpersonal Relations _2bisacsh _9884652
655		4	_aElectronic books. _9396
700	1		_aLétourneau, Alain. _9993414
830		0	_aDialogue studies. _9435879
856	4	0	_3EBSCOhost _uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=502116
938			_aEBL - Ebook Library _bEBLB _nEBL1068549
938			_aEBSCOhost _bEBSC _n502116
910			_acpp2010
994			_a02 _bN$T
999			_c669683 _d669683