000 03916cam a2200685Mu 4500
001 ocn870245006
003 OCoLC
005 20240829110412.0
006 m d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 140208s2012 dcu o 000 0 eng d
040 _aEBLCP
_beng
_epn
_cEBLCP
_dOCLCQ
_dDEBBG
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCF
_dN$T
_dVT2
_dYDXCP
_dOCLCO
019 _a887371037
_a903698817
020 _a9781475512342
020 _a1475512341
020 _a1475593686
_qelectronic bk.
020 _a9781475593686
_qelectronic bk.
035 _a(OCoLC)870245006
_z(OCoLC)887371037
_z(OCoLC)903698817
037 _b00013468
043 _aa-ii---
050 4 _aHD61
072 7 _aBUS
_x082000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aBUS
_x041000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aBUS
_x042000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aBUS
_x085000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a658.15/5
_223
049 _aTEFA
245 0 0 _aBarriers to household risk management
_h[electronic resource] /
_cShawn Cole...[et al.].
260 _aWashington :
_bInternational Monetary Fund,
_c2012.
300 _a1 online resource (44 pages).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aIMF working papers ;
_vWP/12/195
588 0 _aPrint version record.
505 0 _aCover; Abstract; Contents; I. Introduction; II. Insurance Contract Design and Summary Statistics; A. Product Description; B. Summary Statistics; III. Experimental Design; IV. Experimental Results; A. Andhra Pradesh; B. Gujarat: Video Experiments; C. Gujarat: Flyer Experiments; V. Discussion of Experimental Results; A. Price Relative to Actuarial Value; B. Trust; C. Liquidity Constraints; D. Financial Literacy and Education; E. Framing, Salience and Other Behavioral Factors; VI. Non-Experimental Evidence; A. Correlates of Insurance Purchase; B. Self-Reported Explanations for Non-Purchase.
505 8 _aVII. Improving Household Risk Management: Tentative Lessons and ConclusionsReferences; VIII. Appendix.
520 _aWhy do many households remain exposed to large exogenous sources of non-systematic income risk? We use a series of randomized field experiments in rural India to test the importance of price and non-price factors in the adoption of an innovative rainfall insurance product. Demand is significantly price sensitive, but widespread take-up would not be achieved even if the product offered a payout ratio comparable to U.S. insurance contracts. We present evidence suggesting that lack of trust, liquidity constraints and limited salience are significant non-price frictions that constrain demand. We s.
650 0 _aFinancial risk
_zIndia.
_9727550
650 0 _aRisk management
_zIndia.
_9727551
650 7 _aFinancial risk.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01739663
_9202127
650 7 _aRisk management.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01098164
_92691
651 7 _aIndia.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01210276
_9120240
650 7 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industrial Management
_2bisacsh
_9178986
650 7 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Management
_2bisacsh
_9178987
650 7 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Management Science
_2bisacsh
_9178988
650 7 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Organizational Behavior
_2bisacsh
_9178989
655 4 _aElectronic books.
_9396
700 1 _aTownsend, Robert M.
_9727552
700 1 _aCole, Shawn.
_9727553
700 1 _aTobacman, Jeremy.
_9727554
700 1 _aGine, Xavier.
_9727555
700 1 _aVickery, James Ian.
_9727556
700 1 _aTopalova, Petia.
_9727557
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aTownsend, Robert M.
_tBarriers to Household Risk Management: Evidence from India.
_dWashington : International Monetary Fund, ©2012
_z9781475505443
830 0 _aIMF working paper (Online) ;
_vWP/12/195.
_9727558
856 4 0 _3EBSCOhost
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=568125
938 _aEBSCOhost
_bEBSC
_n568125
994 _aC0
_bTEF
999 _c670362
_d670362